خلاصه ماشینی:
"The present paper with analytic-descriptive approach tries to solve the available apparent contradiction with the analysis of legal-jurisprudential bases and Imami jurists and law scholars of Iran in the ground of the interdiction in this way that the legislator in article 212 of the civil code(volumel)has announced that the decrees of the mentioned interdicted persons are void and in the second volume, from article 1207 to up has stated that the decrees of the mentioned ones in article 212 of the civil code jind article 213 of the civil code have related to the persons who are prohibited to possess all or some of their properties with a court or law jurisdiction.
The present research aims to determine, criticize and explore the stated reasons to the validity and invalidity of this type of suspension and it is most acceptable the invalid theory from the perspective of argumentative jurisprudence and the case law.
Sadeghi(A PhD student of Jurisprudence and Foundation of Islamic Law) The continued separation of the intent and consent(in the civil code especially in article 190 which has counted the intent and consent the principal provisions of the parties contract)creates the question of being lawful this separation in the mind of the researchers.
The Islamic jurists and Abstracts A Critique on the Indication(Revealeir)Theory of the Latter Consent of the Compelled Person n Roshan Ali Shekari(Associate professor at University of Tehran) i j Muhammad Reza Dashti(An M, A student of Private Law) Article 190 of the civil code has stated the general principles of the validity of the contracts."